Reinforcement learning paradigm reshapes by recognizing pain as a key factor, suggesting more effective algorithms.
Conventional reinforcement learning (RL) paradigms, rooted in dopaminergic reward prediction, conflate the absence of reward with punishment. This simplification overlooks pain, a biologically distinct aversive signal with dedicated neural pathways and learning mechanisms. Here we introduce Deinforcement Learning, a framework that integrates pain as an independent computational driver of behavior. Drawing on evidence from neuroscience, psychology, and cognitive science, we show how pain circuits provide rapid, high-salience signals for avoidance and safety, complementing reward-based adaptation. We formalize this perspective in the MaxPain model, which rebalances learning between appetitive and aversive drives. This reconceptualization advances biologically grounded models of decision-making and suggests algorithms with faster convergence, improved robustness, and safer exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: