Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasibility study reveals effects of pre-treatment procedures on urinary creatinine accuracy, suggesting implications for metabolic disorder diagnosis.
Introduction: Creatinine (Cr) is a chemical waste breakdown product of creatine and Cr levels can assist in diagnosing the functioning of the kidneys and it can be measured as part of basic- or comprehensive metabolic panel tests. Urinary creatinine (UCr) is often used to calculate urine analyte concentrations of metabolic panel tests, which emphasizes the need for infallibly accurate UCr results. Methods: Cr analysis was performed using an enzymatic Cr analysis kit. A total of four ERNDIM EQA urine samples with known Cr values and four samples with unknown Cr values were used in this study. Results: For the known Cr value samples, a percentage difference from the known value was calculated for each comparison. The rotated and centrifuged result comparison showed the lowest % difference from the known UCr value for known samples 1 and 4: 0.31% and 0.34% respectively. The centrifuged comparison showed lower % differences compared to those of the initial and repeat results. For the unknown UCr value samples results, standard deviations, averages and %CV (coefficient of variance) were calculated. Conclusion: This feasibility study, however small, is suggestive proof that there is indeed necessity and room for optimization when it comes to standardisation of pre-treatment procedures prior to UCr analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beukes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: