Innovation in mortar using lotus leaf extract improves corrosion protection and mechanical properties in reinforced concrete.
Reinforced concrete structures in harsh environments are highly vulnerable to structural damage caused by rebar corrosion. However, there remains a critical shortage of high-performance, environmentally friendly repair materials that integrate both structural restoration and long-term corrosion protection functionalities to address this issue. To meet this demand, this study innovatively developed an eco-friendly, high-performance repair material using lotus leaf extract (LLE)-modified mortar and systematically evaluated its corrosion protection performance and mechanisms under chloride attack conditions. The primary chemical constituents of LLE include alkaloids and flavonoids, rich in polar functional groups such as O–H, N–H, and C–O. The LLE modifier increased the fluidity of fresh cement paste, thereby improving its construction workability. A low dosage of LLE modifier promoted cement hydration. When the LLE dosage was 0.2 wt%, the 7-day and 28-day flexural strengths of the LLE-modified mortar increased by 16.8% and 7.48%, respectively, compared to those of unmodified mortar, while the compressive strengths increased by 30.6% and 14.5%, respectively. The LLE-modified mortar demonstrated significant protection against chloride corrosion, effectively inhibiting rebar corrosion. Electrochemical corrosion results indicated that compared to unmodified mortar, the modified mortar containing 0.5 wt% LLE exhibited an 80% improvement in protection efficiency against chloride corrosion. These results demonstrate that an appropriate dosage of LLE modifier can simultaneously optimize the fundamental properties of mortar and provide excellent chloride corrosion protection. Therefore, LLE-modified mortar shows promising application potential in integrated repair and corrosion protection engineering for reinforced concrete structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: