Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial confirmed bioequivalence of ferric carboxymaltose and the reference preparation in adults with IDA, suggesting safety.
The objectives of this study were to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of the test (T) preparation (Ferric carboxymaltose injection, BrightGene Bio‐Medical Technology Co. Ltd.) and reference (R) preparation (Ferinject, Vifor France) after intravenous injection in Chinese adult subjects with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) under fasting conditions. Conducted as a single‐center, randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group trial, the study enrolled 96 IDA patients who were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive a 500 mg intravenous dose of either the T or R preparation. Post‐dose blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at multiple time points, while any adverse events were documented. The pharmacokinetic results showed comparable serum concentration‐time curves between the two groups. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of C max , AUC 0− t , and AUC 0−∞ of total serum iron and C max , AUC 0− t of serum transferrin‐bound iron were within the predefined bioequivalence criterion of 80%–125%, indicating bioequivalence between the T and R preparations under fasting conditions. There were no significant differences in the safety profile between the two groups. This study confirmed the bioequivalence of the T and R preparations under fasting conditions, along with good safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: