This research demonstrates new bounds for quasigroup isomorphism and other problems, suggesting fresh insights into circuit complexity.
We investigate the constant-depth circuit complexity of the Isomorphism Problem, Minimum Generating Set Problem (MGS), and Sub(quasi)group Membership Problem (Membership) for groups and quasigroups (=Latin squares), given as input in terms of their multiplication (Cayley) tables. Despite decades of research on these problems, lower bounds for these problems even against depth-$2$ AC circuits remain unknown. Perhaps surprisingly, Chattopadhyay, Torán, and Wagner (FSTTCS 2010; ACM Trans. Comput. Theory, 2013) showed that Quasigroup Isomorphism could be solved by AC circuits of depth O(log log n) using O(log² n) nondeterministic bits, a class we denote ∃log²(n)FOLL. We narrow this gap by improving the upper bound for many of these problems to quasiAC⁰, thus decreasing the depth to constant. In particular, we show: - MGS for quasigroups is in ∃log²(n)∀log nNTIME(polylog(n))⊆ quasiAC⁰. Papadimitriou and Yannakakis (J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 1996) conjectured that this problem was ∃log²(n)P-complete; our results refute a version of that conjecture for completeness under quasiAC⁰ reductions unconditionally, and under polylog-space reductions assuming EXP ≠ PSPACE. - MGS for groups is in AC¹(L), improving on the previous upper bound of P (Lucchini & Thakkar, J. Algebra, 2024). - Quasigroup Isomorphism belongs to ∃log²(n)AC⁰(DTISP(polylog,log)⊆ quasiAC⁰, improving on the previous bound of ∃log²(n)L∩∃log²(n)FOLL⊆ quasiFOLL (Chattopadhyay, Torán, & Wagner, ibid.; Levet, Australas. J. Combin., 2023). Our results suggest that understanding the constant-depth circuit complexity may be key to resolving the complexity of problems concerning (quasi)groups in the multiplication table model. 39 pages. This is the TheoretiCS journal version
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: