PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2025Frontiers in Endocrinology21 citationsOpen Access

Global prevalence of insulin resistance in the adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JBJhosmer Ballena-CaicedoFZFiorella E. Zuzunaga-MontoyaJLJoan A. Loayza-Castro

Key Points

  • Global prevalence of insulin resistance is 26.53%, with estimates ranging from 26% to 30% in various populations.
  • The study included 87 studies with 235,148 participants, utilizing the HOMA-IR index for estimation.
  • Methodology involved a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model to assess heterogeneity.
  • No significant differences in prevalence were found based on sampling designs or stratified by sex.

Abstract

Objective To determine the global prevalence of IR, evaluating differences according to study designs and population characteristics. Methodology A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. The search encompassed MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, including observational studies that employed the HOMA-IR index to estimate IR and published adult prevalence data. Articles without clear IR definitions or with highly specific populations were excluded. The meta-analysis applied a random-effects model with proportion transformation (Freeman-Tukey), assessing heterogeneity with I² and Cochran’s Q test. Additionally, a meta-regression by publication year was conducted. Results Eighty-seven studies were included, with 235,148 participants. The pooled prevalence of IR was estimated at 26.53% (95% CI: 24.10–29.03; I²=99%), with no statistically significant differences when comparing probabilistic versus non-probabilistic sampling or when stratifying by sex. The meta-regression revealed no clear variations according to publication year or other explored factors. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates that IR reaches a global prevalence of 26.53%, with estimated differences between 26% and 30% across different populations and geographical regions. Despite the diversity in cut-off points employed for HOMA-IR, no statistically significant differences were observed when comparing sampling designs or stratifying by sex. Furthermore, no clear trend related to publication year was evidenced.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ballena-Caicedo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55d1ad7bf08b1eadc48fhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1646258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The biological variation of insulin resistance markers: data from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS)2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Effects of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Gene Polymorphisms on Insulin Resistance in a Japanese General Population: The Tanno-Sobetsu Study2006 · 28 citations
  3. 3Endothelial versus Metabolic Insulin Resistance, A Descriptive Review2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Prevalence estimates of the insulin resistance and associated prevalence of heart failure among United Status adults2023 · 30 citations
  5. 5InsuTAG: A novel physiologically relevant predictor for insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome2017 · 12 citations