Virtual screening identifies anidulafungin as a potent PD-L1 inhibitor, suggesting novel cancer immunotherapy options.
Background/Objectives: Monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint have achieved clinical success but face drawbacks such as poor oral bioavailability, limited tumor penetration, and immune-related adverse events. Small-molecule inhibitors present a promising alternative that may overcome these challenges. Methods: Here, an integrated computational framework combining ligand-based pharmacophore modeling and structure-based molecular docking was utilized to screen a comprehensive library consisting of traditional Chinese medicine-derived compounds and clinically approved drugs. The binding affinity between identified candidate compounds and PD-L1 was quantitatively assessed using bio-layer interferometry (BLI). In vitro cytotoxicity assays were conducted on A549 human lung carcinoma and LLC mouse lung carcinoma cell lines. In vivo antitumor efficacy was evaluated in LLC tumor-bearing mice through measurement of tumor growth inhibition, serum cytokine levels (IFN-γ and IL-4) by ELISA, and expression levels of IFN-γ and granzyme B (GZMB) within tumor tissues via immunohistochemistry. Results: In vitro, anidulafungin exhibited anti-tumor effects against both human lung cancer A549 cells and mouse Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) tumor cells, with IC50 values of 170.6 µg/mL and 160.9 µg/mL, respectively. The BLI analysis revealed a dissociation constant (KD) of 76.9 μM, indicating a high affinity of anidulafungin for PD-L1. In vivo, anidulafungin significantly increased serum levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 in tumor-bearing mice and elevated expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B (GZMB) in tumor tissues, confirming its immune-mediated anti-tumor effects. Conclusions: Anidulafungin represents a promising small-molecule PD-L1 inhibitor, demonstrating significant anti-tumor potential via immune activation and highlighting the feasibility of repurposing approved drugs for cancer immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: