What type of study is this?

This is a RCT study (also classified as: Pre-Registered Trial).

August 21, 2025

Three months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid versus four months of rifampicin for tuberculosis infection: a randomised controlled trial

VCVicky ChangThe University of Sydney QLQingbin LiThe University of Sydney DBDavid BarnesThe University of Sydney

Key Points

Higher treatment completion in the 3HP group reached 84.9%, compared to 65.4% in the 4RIF group, showing a significant difference.
Relative risk for completion between regimens was 1.30, with a p-value of 0.002, indicating strong evidence of effectiveness.
This multicentre randomised controlled trial enrolled 210 participants with tuberculosis infection over five years, assessing completion rates.
Findings support broader implementation of 3HP in tuberculosis infection programs and highlight the importance of regular reminders.

Abstract

Background Treatment of tuberculosis infection (TBI) is a cornerstone of the WHO End TB Strategy. Two widely recommended short-course regimens - weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine for 12 weeks (3HP) and daily rifampicin for 16 weeks (4RIF) - have not been directly compared in a randomised trial. This study aimed to compare treatment completion between 3HP and 4RIF among individuals with TBI. Methods We conducted a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at seven tuberculosis clinics in Sydney, Australia, between July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2024. Participants of any age with TBI were randomised 1:1 using a computer-generated, site-stratified sequence to receive either 3HP (isoniazid 15 mg/kg max 900 mg plus rifapentine 900 mg weekly for 12 weeks) or 4RIF (rifampicin 10 mg/kg max 600 mg, daily for 16 weeks). All doses were self-administered. Participants in the 3HP group received weekly SMS reminders; both groups received standard clinic follow-up. The primary outcome was treatment completion, defined as ingestion of >=90 percent of prescribed doses, assessed at the end of treatment. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, including all randomised participants. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001672246) and is closed to new enrolments. Findings A total of 210 participants were enrolled (106 assigned to 3HP, 104 to 4RIF; 121 57.6 percent female, 89 42.4 percent male). Completion was higher in the 3HP group (90/106 84.9 percent) than the 4RIF group (68/104 65.4 percent; relative risk 1.30, 95 percent CI 1.10 to 1.53; p=0.002). Adverse events of any grade occurred in 26/106 (24.5 percent) in the 3HP group and 21/104 (20.2 percent) in the 4RIF group. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation The 3HP regimen, supported by SMS reminders, led to significantly higher treatment completion than 4RIF. These findings support broader implementation of 3HP in TBI programs to improve adherence and outcomes. Funding This study was funded by an Investigator Grant (#2007920) from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), with additional in-kind support from Sanofi Pharmaceuticals and the generous assistance of staff at the participating tuberculosis clinics.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper