Novel approach improves sampling efficiency and model accuracy in radar anti-jamming evaluations, indicating its practical use.
Adaptive sampling is an efficient computational strategy for iteratively selecting informative samples under constrained budgets by leveraging existing data. To address the challenge of constructing high-fidelity evaluation models for radar anti-jamming performance with limited resources, this study proposes a novel multiple responses adaptive sampling method. The approach employs Bayesian Support Vector Regression (BSVR) to estimate sample variances and gradients across the design space, enabling the design of a multi-response learning function to guide sample selection. In the learning function, sample variance and nearest-neighbor gradient projection (NNGP) are combined to balance global exploration and local exploitation. Further, weight factor based on the mean and maximum value of NNGP are assigned to different responses thus balancing their accuracies. Five function examples, two real-world datasets, and one engineering case study validate the effectiveness of the method. Numerical examples show that when the determination coefficients are all 0.9, approximately 50% of sample points can be saved on average compared to other experimental design methods. Real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms other methods in terms of sampling efficiency, regardless of the number of additional sample points added. In radar anti-jamming performance evaluation, the proposed method can significantly improve model accuracy by 10% to 20% under the same sample budget. The proposed method demonstrates superior performance in minimizing sampling points and experimental expenditures for multi-response modeling, showing considerable promise for practical applications in optimal experimental design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: