PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2025Congenital Anomalies0 citations

Chromosomal Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Single Center Experience From Türkiye

View Full Paper
GKGülsüm KayhanMKMeral Yirmibeş KaraoğuzPÇPınar Çalış

Key Points

  • 4.8% of prenatal samples showed pathogenic variants, emphasizing the significance of chromosomal microarray.
  • CMA revealed 21 pathogenic variants among 373 samples, highlighting its role in prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases.
  • Assessment using chromosomal microarray focused on fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities, family histories, and abnormal screening results.
  • CMA reporting is crucial for effective genetic counseling and managing cases with unique breakpoints in prenatal findings.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a powerful method for detecting copy number alterations and is regularly used to diagnose various genetic diseases. Numerous reports from different populations have documented the applicability of CMA in prenatal diagnosis. Nevertheless, such efforts are still needed to survey the pertinence of this method in the presence of clinical findings. Hence, the present study aims to record the results of CMA in a large Turkish cohort. The study consisted of 373 prenatal samples. CMA was performed on fetuses with various ultrasound (USG) abnormalities, family histories, or abnormal screening test results. Fetal anomalies were divided into groups according to USG findings. By CMA analyses, 18 patients (18/373; 4.8%) had 21 pathogenic variants. Seven of the 21 pathogenic variants were recurrent microdeletions or duplications, whereas 14 had unique breakpoints. This study emphasized the importance and effectiveness of CMA in prenatal diagnosis. It further highlighted that reporting the results, particularly in cases with a unique breakpoint, is essential for genetic counseling and management in prenatal cases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kayhan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5bbcad7bf08b1eadf9aahttps://doi.org/10.1111/cga.70022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper