PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 23, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Meta-analysis and Systematic Review on Philippine Mental Health and Climate Resilience: Basis for Designing Climate-Resilient Communities through Evidence-based Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Collaborative Strategies and Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction

View Full Paper
RVResti Tito VillarinoMVMaureen Lorence Villarino

Key Points

  • Community-based interventions significantly improve climate resilience and reduce mental health issues, especially PTSD, depression, and anxiety.
  • Among 32 studies with 45,247 participants, pooled PTSD prevalence was found to be 35.2%, with depression at 18.4% and anxiety at 31.8%.
  • Meta-analysis conducted following PRISMA guidelines utilized quantitative and qualitative methodologies to synthesize evidence.
  • Findings highlight the need for culturally tailored interventions and collaborative strategies to address mental health within disaster risk reduction frameworks.

Abstract

Background: Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to community resilience across the ASEAN region, with the Philippines serving as a critical case for investigating links between environmental stressors and community mental health. This meta-analysis and systematic review examine how community-based mental health interventions strengthen climate resilience within disaster risk reduction and resilient infrastructure frameworks.Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched eight databases for literature published between 2010 and 2025. Quantitative synthesis used Review Manager (v5.4) and R (v4.4.3); qualitative analysis used MAXQDA (2020). GRADE assessment evaluated the certainty of evidence across primary outcomes.Results: Thirty-two studies (N=45,247) revealed substantial climate-related mental health impacts: pooled PTSD prevalence 35.2% (95% CI 28.6-42.1), depression 18.4% (95% CI 14.7-22.8), and anxiety 31.8% (95% CI 25.3-39.1). Meta-regression revealed that disaster type explained 45% of the heterogeneity variance (p 0.01). Protective community factors significantly reduced the mental health burden, including social networks (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.35-0.52), collective efficacy (OR=0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.49), and cultural practices (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.75). Infrastructure-integrated psychosocial support centers demonstrated 60% greater effectiveness in intervention compared to standalone programs (p 0.001). Women, children, and indigenous communities experienced disproportionate impacts, requiring targeted interventions.Conclusions: Climate-induced mental health impacts require coordinated regional responses within integrated disaster risk reduction frameworks. Aligning with the Sendai Framework priorities, the findings support community-centered, culturally adapted interventions that combine immediate psychosocial support with resilient infrastructure development. ASEAN collaborative strategies are essential for strengthening community mental health systems and advancing Sustainable Development Goals through multi-hazard approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Villarino et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5bc1ad7bf08b1eadfbb8https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qnxe2_v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper