Experimental analysis reveals granite manufactured sand increases skid resistance in concrete pavements, indicating optimal content usage.
The widespread application of granite manufactured sand (GS) concrete in pavement engineering is limited by issues such as suboptimal particle size distribution and an unclear optimal rock powder content. Furthermore, research on the long-term evolution of the skid resistance characteristics of GS concrete remains relatively scarce. This knowledge gap makes it difficult to accurately assess the skid resistance performance of GS concrete in practical engineering applications, thereby compromising traffic safety. To address this research gap, this study utilized a self-developed indoor abrasion tester for pavement concrete to assess the skid resistance of GS concrete. Three-dimensional laser scanning was employed to acquire the concrete’s surface texture parameters. Using the friction coefficient and texture parameters as skid resistance evaluation indicators, and combining these with changes in the concrete’s surface morphology, the study explores how effective sand content, stone powder content, and fine aggregate lithology affect the long-term skid resistance of GS concrete pavements and reveals the evolution trends of their long-term skid resistance. Research results show that as the number of wear cycles increases, low and high effective sand content affect the surface friction coefficient of specimens in opposite ways. Specimens with 95% effective sand content exhibit superior skid resistance. Stone powder content influences the friction coefficient in three distinct variation patterns, showing no clear overall trend. Nevertheless, specimens with 5% stone powder content demonstrate better skid resistance. Among different fine aggregate lithologies, GS yields a higher friction coefficient than river sand (RS), while limestone manufactured sand (LS) shows significant friction coefficient fluctuations across different wear cycles. Adding stone powder substantially enhances mortar strength and delays groove collapse edge formation. Moreover, higher effective sand content and proper stone powder content mitigate bleeding, thereby improving mortar performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: