Simulation methods assess system performance in automated container terminals, indicating design efficiency implications.
Automated container terminals can achieve precise matching of equipment and space, thus forming the foundation for the terminals’ efficient operation. However, the increase in container volume requires the construction of more ACTs. Existing studies lack dynamic assessment of the deep coupling between the P-shaped layout and the terminal’s system performance verification under peak operating conditions. To solve these problems, this paper aims to evaluate the system performance of the process layout in the application of ACTs through simulation methods. We have identified the differences in indicators among various schemes, thereby providing decision support for the construction of the port. In this paper, a simulation method for the configuration based on a P-shaped process layout is proposed at ACTs. The port system is constructed as a discrete event simulation model consisting of five core modules. Then two P-shaped process layout schemes and one mixed process layout scheme are proposed and the terminal models are established, respectively. Finally, by conducting numerous simulation experiments under different layout schemes, the influence of traffic organization on the efficiency of the terminal system was analyzed. The results demonstrate that on the premise of the maturity of the mixed-traffic technology at the terminal, when the proportion of cross-berth operations is low, the system efficiency of the mixed layout scheme is the highest. This article takes a new type of P-shaped process layout as the research object, reveals the correlation between its traffic organization characteristics and system performance through a customized simulation method. It provides a new theoretical perspective and quantitative tool for the optimization of automated terminal layouts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: