Analysis reveals that radial displacement affects irradiance from light curing units, suggesting careful positioning is crucial.
Objective To determine the effect of differences in the distances and radial positions of the tips of Light‐Curing Units (LCU) on the irradiance values delivered. Materials and Methods Four LCUs —Valo X, Emitter A, CuringPen , and Pinkwave were tested at different distances from the tip (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 mm) and radial displacements (2 and 4 mm East, West, North, South). The radiant power ( mW ) and emission spectrum ( mW /nm) were measured using an integrating sphere with a 4 mm aperture. Calibrated irradiance beam profiles were recorded across the tip using a laser beam analyzer. Data were analyzed with a two‐way ANOVA at a significance level of 5%. Results Radial displacement significantly reduced the irradiance values delivered from all four LCUs ( p < 0.05). At 4 mm, the mean irradiance value was below 1000 mW /cm 2 for Emitter A (256 mW/cm 2 ), CuringPen (573 mW/cm 2 ), and Valo X (955 mW/cm 2 ), but not for the Pinkwave (1157 mW /cm 2 ). At the 2 and 4 mm distance from the tip, the Valo X delivered consistent mean irradiance values at both the center and radial positions (2 mm: 1120 mW /cm 2 and 1089 mW /cm 2 ; 4 mm: 979 mW /cm 2 and 945 mW /cm 2 , p > 0.05). The Valo X emitted the most homogeneous beam profile, irrespective of the distance. Conclusion Variations of 2 or 4 mm in the radial tip position negatively affected irradiance values from the LCUs tested. Clinical Significance The radial position and LCU choice can significantly affect the irradiance delivered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guarneri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: