Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals the dual fault form of environmental pollution crimes, suggesting improved legal clarity and fairness.
The view that the subjective element of the crime of environmental pollution should be exclusively categorized as either intent or negligence would create punishment gaps for this offense and does not align with the actual cir-cum-stances of judicial practice. The crime of environmental pollution is one with a dual fault form, meaning both intentional and negligent acts of environ-mental pollution can constitute the crime. The reason for establishing the crime of en-vironmental pollution with a dual fault form in criminal law is to address the difficulty of proving the subjective element of this offense. The dual fault form not only lowers the standard of proof but also reduces the statutory penal-ty, preventing minor offenses from being heavily punished. Therefore, it does not violate the principle of proportionality between crime, responsibility, and punishment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiang Fan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: