This analysis demonstrates a dynamic assessment of psychological safety in aviation, highlighting interaction with mental health and safety performance.
The assurance of aviation safety and service quality is highly dependent on the psychological state of flight crew members. As a core determinant of safe decision-making and behavioral resilience, mental health necessitates the development of a scientific and dynamic evaluation system. This study centers on the coupling mechanism between mental health and safety margin, and proposes a dynamic evaluation model for the psychological safety margin of cabin crew members based on a backpropagation (BP) neural network. Experimental results show that the BP neural network achieves a coefficient of determination of R[Formula: see text] between the predicted and actual safety margins, indicating an excellent level of predictive accuracy. The model successfully establishes a real-time assessment framework that links psychological health with operational safety margin. By enabling the dynamic coupling of crew mental state and safety performance, this BP-based approach introduces a novel paradigm for proactive risk warning in aviation safety management. By leveraging quantitative tools to uncover the black box between psychological health and safety behavior, this approach facilitates a shift in aviation safety management from post-incident accountability to proactive prevention. It offers an advanced risk management paradigm for high-reliability human-operated environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: