Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Network meta-analysis of 67 RCTs indicates efpeglenatide significantly reduces metastatic cancer events, suggesting broad preventive effects on oncology.
Metastatic cancer, characterized by poor survival outcomes and grim prognosis, represents the final stage of malignancy. The current evidence regarding the prophylactic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on metastatic cancer remains largely unexamined. With a confirmatory approach based on the Cochrane recommendation, we conducted a frequentist-based network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating such medications. The primary outcome was the incidence of metastatic cancer, while secondary outcomes included safety profiles assessed through dropout rates. The findings were reaffirmed by sensitivity analysis with a Bayesian-based NMA. This NMA of 207,606 participants from 67 RCTs revealed that only efpeglenatide demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in metastatic cancer events compared to controls (odds ratio = 0.26, 95% confidence intervals = 0.09 to 0.70, p = 0.010, number needed to treat = 188.4). Efpeglenatide’s efficacy was not confined to specific cancer types. Safety profiles were comparable across all treatments. These findings indicate that efpeglenatide may possess a broad, systemic preventive effect against metastatic cancers, potentially operating through mechanisms that are not restricted to individual organ systems. Further research is warranted to elucidate the molecular pathways underlying its anti-metastatic properties and to explore its role in preventive oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: