Retrospective study shows inflammatory markers differentiate effusion types in kids, indicating their role in hearing recovery.
Background and Objectives: Otitis media with effusion (OME), frequently associated with obstructive adenoid hypertrophy (OAH), is a leading cause of paediatric hearing loss. Clinically distinguishing effusion types (serous vs. mucoid) and predicting postoperative hearing recovery are unresolved challenges. This study evaluated the utility of preoperative blood inflammatory markers in predicting effusion characteristics and short-term hearing outcomes following adenoidectomy with tympanostomy tube (TT) insertion. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 232 children under 12 years old in 2024 and undergoing adenoidectomy (with or without TT insertion) were categorised into serous OME (n = 42), mucoid OME (n = 78), and non-effusion (n = 112) groups. Preoperative blood sample analyses assessed neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, basophil, and platelet counts, along with derived indices, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), eosinophil-to-basophil ratio (EBR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and systemic immune–inflammation index (SII). Hearing was evaluated at 2 weeks and 1 month postoperatively. Statistical analyses used SPSS v.28, with significance set at p < 0.05. Result: Mucoid OME patients exhibited significantly elevated neutrophil counts, platelet counts, eosinophils, NLR, and SII compared to those in serous OME and non-effusion groups (p < 0.05). All serous OME children achieved normal hearing by the first follow-up, whereas 15.4% of mucoid OME cases had transient mild hearing loss persisting after 2 weeks (p = 0.008; OR=15.97) but resolving by 1 month. Preoperative neutrophil count independently predicted delayed hearing recovery (p = 0.021). Conclusions: Systemic inflammatory markers, particularly neutrophil count, NLR, and SII, effectively differentiate mucoid OME from other effusion types and correlate with short-term hearing recovery. Neutrophil count may serve as a prognostic tool for surgical planning and patient counselling. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings in broader paediatric populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almutairi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: