Comparative study assesses AI performance in treatment plans for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, highlighting traditional Chinese medicine applications.
Background ChatGPT-4.0 and the ChatGLM series are novel conversational large language models (LLMs). ChatGLM includes 3 versions: ChatGLM4 (with internet connectivity but no knowledge base pretraining), ChatGLM4+Knowledge base (combining internet search capabilities with knowledge base pretraining), ChatGLM3-6B (offline knowledge base pretraining but no internet connectivity). The ability of ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGLM to apply medical knowledge in the Chinese environment has been preliminarily verified, but the potential of the 2 models for clinical assistance in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is still unknown. Objective This study aims to explore the performance of ChatGPT-4.0, ChatGLM4, ChatGLM4+Knowledge base, and ChatGLM3-6B in providing AI-assisted diagnosis and treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease within a TCM clinical framework, thereby assessing their potential as TCM clinical decision support tools. Methods This study evaluated 4 LLMs by providing them with medical records of 87 metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease cases treated with TCM and querying them about TCM treatment plans. The answering texts from 4 LLMs were evaluated using predefined scoring criteria, focusing on 3 critical dimensions: ability in syndrome differentiation and treatment principles, confusion of concepts between TCM and Western medicine, and comprehensive evaluation of question-answering texts (comprising 6 components: ability to integrate Chinese and Western medicine, ability to formulate treatment plans, health management capacity, disease monitoring ability, self-positioning awareness, and medication safety). Results In the evaluation module of “Ability in syndrome differentiation and treatment principles,” the performance ranking of the 4 models was: (1) ChatGLM4+ Knowledge Base, (2) ChatGLM4, (3) ChatGLM3-6B, and (4) ChatGPT-4.0. Regarding the assessment of confusion between TCM and Western medicine concepts, ChatGPT-4.0 exhibited conceptual confusion in 32 out of 87 cases, while the ChatGLM series of LLMs showed no such confusion (except for ChatGLM3-6B, which had 1 instance). In the “Comprehensive evaluation of question-answering texts” module (comprising 6 components: ability to integrate Chinese and Western medicine, ability to formulate treatment plans, health management capacity, disease monitoring ability, self-positioning awareness, and medication safety), the ranking was: (1) ChatGLM4+ Knowledge Base, (2) ChatGPT-4.0, (3) ChatGLM4, and (4) ChatGLM3-6B. Conclusions Our study results demonstrated that real-time internet connectivity played a critical role in LLM-assisted TCM diagnosis and treatment, while offline models showed significantly reduced performance in clinical decision support. Furthermore, pretraining LLMs with TCM-specific knowledge bases while maintaining internet search capabilities substantially enhanced their diagnostic and therapeutic performance in TCM applications. Importantly, general-purpose LLMs required both domain-specific medical fine-tuning and culturally sensitive adaptation to meet the rigorous standards of TCM clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: