The article examines the implications of Wheeler's work on the Bohr-Høffding relationship, suggesting connections in philosophy and science.
Next article No AccessWhat can Wheeler tell us about the Bohr-Høffding relationship?Jan Faye, Stefano Furlan and Rasmus JakslandJan Faye, Stefano Furlan, and Rasmus JakslandPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookXLinkedInRedditBlueskyEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by HOPOS Just Accepted Sponsored by The International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/738332 PermissionsRequest permissions HistoryAccepted July 24, 2025 © 2025 The International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: