Comparative analysis highlights different institutional reform scenarios for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in Hungary's communities and their implications.
Introduction: Romania, Slovakia and Serbia are nation states in which significant Hungarian ethnic territorial communities are settled. The communities are regularly articulating regionalist demands for granting/expansion of autonomy and minority rights. Thus, the states are faced with the challenge of managing such political-territorial heterogeneity, which is an important research topic. The subject of this article is the institutional management of political-territorial heterogeneity in relation to Hungarian ethnic minorities by the national center in Romania, Serbia and Slovakia. The research focuses on institutional reforms for the management of political-territorial heterogeneity in Romania, Slovakia and Serbia, concerning the Hungarian ethnic community as a territorial community. Objectives: to determine the scenarios of institutional reform as a mechanism for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in relation to Hungarian communities used by the national governments of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia in the period 1990–2020s. Methods: comparative small-N analysis, comparative-oriented case study. Results: cases of institutional reforms as a mechanism for managing political-territorial heterogeneity regarding the Hungarian territorial communities demonstrate different scenarios: the national governments of Romania and Slovakia demonstrate similar scenarios (European integration as a significant incentive, limited pragmatic decentralization, territorial reconfiguration to limit the structural power of the Hungarian community, similar institutional formats of subnational units autonomies ); Serbia stands out for its own structural and institutional specifics (virtual absence of external incentives, orientation towards the Hungarian community and regionalist actors, a clear vision of the institutional configuration of the autonomy). Conclusions: the studied scenarios of institutional reform are mechanisms for managing political-territorial heterogeneity in Romania, Slovakia and Serbia and contribute to the elimination of threats to territorial integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhail V. Grabevnik (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: