Research demonstrates the relationship between certified domination and reinforcement numbers in graphs, suggesting implications for graph theory applications.
A certified dominating set D of a graph G is a dominating set in which every vertex in D must have either no neighbors or at least two neighbors in V, where V denotes the set of all vertices in G. A certified domination number of G represented by γcer(G) is defined as the smallest size of such a certified dominating set of G. The reinforcement number r(G) is defined to be the cardinality of minimum number of edges F ⊂ E(Gˉ) such that γ(G + F) < γ(G), broadened this parameter to encompass certified domination and we define certified reinforcement number of a graph G, rcer(G) to be the cardinality of the minimum number of edges F ⊂ E(¯G) such that γcer(G + F) < γcer(G) that is minimum number of edges to be added to decrease the certified domination number of G at least by one. In this paper, we characterize the graph G for which rcer(G) = 1 and determine the values of certified reinforcement number for various classes of graphs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navamani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: