Qualitative analysis uncovers mistrust themes among citizens towards scientific experts during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a complex interplay of perspectives.
This article investigates beliefs contributing to public mistrust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium. Through a qualitative analysis of a sample of (highly) critical e-mails from 25 citizens to two prominent Belgian scientific experts (N = 924), it uncovers recurring themes tied to mistrust dynamics. Three theoretical perspectives–biopolitics, scientism, and New Age spirituality–are explored. Within the biopolitical framework, concerns emerge about increased government control, perceived undemocratic governance, and expert interference in decision making. In the realm of scientism, themes of scientific uncertainty, expert dissensus, and suspicions of hidden agendas surface. The analysis also uncovers traces of New Age spirituality, encompassing spirituality and connection, conflicts between natural immunity and vaccines, and the influence of conspiracy beliefs. In summary, this study offers vital insights into the intricate dynamics of trust during the pandemic, shedding light on the multifaceted reasons behind public mistrust in science in Belgium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coninck et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: