Retrospective cohort study shows changes in myocardial inflammation using cardiac MRI during immunomodulatory therapy.
Objective To evaluate changes in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) tissue characteristics in patients with active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) confirmed by positron emission tomography (PET)-CT undergoing immunomodulatory therapy (IMT), and to explore their potential use for inflammation monitoring. Design Retrospective observational cohort study. Setting Tertiary care referral centre in Germany. Participants From a cohort of 47 patients with CS, 24 patients with PET-confirmed active myocardial inflammation and complete baseline and follow-up CMR imaging after ≥6 months of IMT were included. Primary and secondary endpoints Primary outcome: Changes in CMR-derived tissue characteristics (T1, T2 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) mass). Secondary outcomes: Changes in functional (ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS)) and morphological parameters (end-diastolic/systolic volume indices (EDVi/ESVi)). Results Patients with PET-confirmed active CS show increased global T1 and T2 compared with healthy volunteers. Over the course of IMT, significant reductions in global T2 (median (IQR): 39 (38–41) ms vs 37 (36–39) ms; p=0.002), LGE-region T2 (43 (40–46) ms vs 41 (38–42) ms; p=0.003), and relative LGE mass (23% (17–38) vs 15% (8–32); p=0.006) were observed. No significant differences were found in EF (p=0.78), GLS (p=0.49), EDVi (p=0.56), ESVi (p=0.28) or native T1 values (p=0.23). Conclusion In patients with PET-confirmed active CS undergoing IMT, serial CMR demonstrated measurable changes in T2 mapping and LGE parameters, suggesting a potential role for CMR tissue characterisation in monitoring myocardial inflammation. However, due to the observational design and absence of a control group, causal treatment effects cannot be confirmed. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the utility of CMR for treatment monitoring in CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vietheer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: