Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research demonstrates the catalytic effectiveness of chiral azacrown ethers in enantioselective reactions, suggesting their potential for reuse across multiple cycles.
In enantioselective reactions, several catalysts can be used, such as chiral crown ethers, which form a special group of them. In addition to the reaction conditions, the structure of the catalyst used also affects the outcome of the reaction. In the case of carbohydrate‐based crown ethers, we previously found that the monoaza‐15‐crown‐5 structure is the most effective, and the generated enantiomeric excess is influenced by the substituent of the nitrogen, the protecting groups of the carbohydrate, and the source of chirality. In this study, macrocycles derived from l ‐threitol were synthesized with a similar structure, and their catalytic activity and reusability were tested and compared in different model reactions along with some previously prepared compounds. Several types of effect‐structure relationships were pointed out, while the enantiomeric excess varied widely. We demonstrated the recoverability of the crown ethers by acidic extraction and subsequent liberation of the azacrown moiety. The regeneration process was investigated more thoroughly in scaled‐up reactions, where the selectivity of the catalysts preserved for three examined cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: