This analysis identifies factors impacting spanning tree structures in chair-free graphs, suggesting potential pathways for future exploration.
If one edge of a claw is subdivided, the resulting graph is called a chair. Spanning trees in claw-free graphs have been widely studied, but we are unable to find prior results on spanning trees in chair-free graphs. We show two sufficient conditions for a connected chair-free graph to have a spanning tree with a bounded number of branch vertices. First, a connected chair-free graph has a spanning tree with at most k branch vertices if its independence number is at most $$ 2k+2 $$ . Second, if a connected chair-free graph of order n has a spanning tree with at most 4 leaves and the degree sum of any five independent vertices is at least $$ n-2 $$ , then the graph has a spanning tree with at most one branch vertex. Similarities and differences between claw-free and chair-free graphs are discussed, and several related conjectures are proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schrader et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: