Case studies reveal differences in updraft velocity and raindrop characteristics in three cloud types, highlighting the role of particle dynamics.
This study utilizes Ka-band millimeter-wave cloud radar (MMCR), assisted by a precipitation phenomenon instrument, to conduct case studies and analyses of convective precipitation, cumulus precipitation, and stratus precipitation in the Xi’an region. Using the Doppler spectral data of the MMCR, dynamic parameters such as vertical air motion velocity (updraft and downdraft) and particle terminal fall velocity within these three types of cloud precipitation were retrieved. The results show that above the melting layer, the maximum updraft velocity in convective clouds reaches 15 m·s−1, and the strong updraft drives cloud droplets to move upward at an average velocity of about 5 m·s−1. The average updraft velocity in cumulus clouds is greater than that in stratus clouds, with updrafts in cumulus and stratus mainly distributed within 1.5–3 m·s−1 and 1–2 m·s−1, respectively. The reflectivity factor of precipitation particles (Ze) is used to correct the equivalent reflectivity factor (Ka-Ze) after attenuation correction below the MMCR melting layer. The accuracy of calculating the raindrop concentration using the Ka-Ze of MMCR was improved below the melting layer. Based on the relationship between terminal fall velocity and particle diameter and using the conversion between the MMCR power spectrum and raindrop spectrum, the concentration, fall velocity, and particle diameter of raindrops are calculated below the melting layer. The results show that the average reflectivity factor, average concentration, and average particle diameter of raindrops follow the order of convective precipitation > cumulus precipitation > stratiform precipitation. However, the average terminal fall velocity distribution of raindrop particles follows a different order: convective precipitation > stratiform precipitation > cumulus precipitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: