Case study reveals enhanced assessments by adopting industrial and systems engineering in utility evaluations, highlighting benchmarking and capital expenditures.
This paper explores the transformative impact of adopting an Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) centric approach in the evaluation of water/wastewater utilities, using the case study of DC Water's mandated five-year independent engineer's assessments. The 2018 report and its predecessors were traditionally led by civil engineers, while the 2023 evaluation witnessed a paradigm shift, entrusting the lead to a Professional Industrial Engineer and a lead investigator with an Operations Research MBA. Highlighting the divergence in methodologies, the study underscores the heightened value derived from an ISE-centric perspective. Key differences include the implementation of tailored questionnaires, both quantitative and qualitative self-assessments, enhancing the depth and breadth of data collected, and the adoption of prespecified criteria ensuring a more rigorous and objective reporting process during site visits. Furthermore, benchmarking practices were integrated into the assessment to evaluate and effectively communicate the quality of utility management. A notable innovation in the 2023 evaluation was the incorporation of historical and forecasted capital expenditures, providing a comprehensive context for understanding findings. The paper emphasizes the significance of including a detailed management and operations evaluation, offering valuable insights for utility management. This shift toward an ISE-centric framework showcases a holistic approach that transcends traditional engineering boundaries, presenting a dynamic model for future utility evaluations, optimizing system operation and maintenance, and facilitating informed decision-making for infrastructure enhancements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corliss et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: