Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals how security governance is shaped by democratic backsliding and populist leadership dynamics.
The relationship between democratic backsliding and security governance requires special attention for many reasons. This study explores that relationship by examining how security governance can become both a tool and a victim under authoritarian populists. The confrontation between populist leaders and bureaucrats arises when bureaucrats are forced to choose between professional objectivity and adherence to the leader’s will. In the final section, the study elaborates on a model developed following empirical research conducted under the supervision of one of the authors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gürer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: