Experimental study finds that triethylamine-modified reed straw significantly enhances nitrate removal, suggesting effective wastewater treatment solutions.
Nitrate pollution in water bodies has become a global environmental problem, and its excessive presence not only leads to eutrophication of water bodies but also threatens human health through the drinking water pathway. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new adsorbents with high adsorption capacity, good selectivity and excellent regeneration performance to solve the problem of nitrate pollution. In this study, reed straw (RS), trimethylamine-modified reed straw (MRS) and triethylamine-modified reed straw (ERS) were prepared by quaternary amination modification for nitrate removal. The adsorption performance, desorption performance, adsorption characteristics under disturbed environment and dynamic adsorption performance were investigated experimentally, and the adsorption mechanism was analyzed by various characterization means. The adsorption performance followed the order ERS (12.25 mg·g−1) > MRS > RS, demonstrating that quaternary amination modification, particularly with triethylamine, significantly enhanced the NO3−-N adsorption capacity. ERS exhibited excellent regeneration stability (over 80% after nine cycles) and high selectivity towards NO3−-N in the presence of competing anions (Cl−, SO42−, humic acid). In the dynamic adsorption experiment, ERS had a breakthrough time of 290 min at a packing height of 3.3 cm, with an adsorption capacity of 10.74 mg·g−1 and good adaptability to flow rate. In the actual wastewater application, the initial NO3−-N removal rate was over 95%, the dynamic desorption rate reached 99.2% and the peak nitrate concentration of the desorbed solution reached 27 times of the initial value, confirming its high efficiency regeneration and enrichment ability. The study shows that the amine-modified reed straw adsorbent has a good potential for application and provides a new way for wastewater treatment plants to solve the problem of nitrate removal 12.25 mg·g−1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: