Numerical analysis examines swirling impacts of three-dimensional configurations in turbulent combustion, highlighting implications for modeling.
The supersonic combustion flow experiment conducted by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) employs a strut-based jet as a flame stabilization device, yielding comprehensive measurements including pressure, velocity, temperature and root mean square of turbulent fluctuating velocity. This dataset serves as a critical validation case for flamelet model evaluation. Previous RANS studies predominantly adopted two-dimensional (2D) simulations to simplify mesh generation. However, the DLR combustor configuration with 15 circular fuel injection holes inherently suggests three-dimensional (3D) flow characteristics. This study systematically compares 2D and 3D RANS approaches while varying the number of modeled fuel injectors (1-3 holes) to investigate geometrical dimensionality effects. Results reveal that under non-reacting conditions, congruence between the 3D computational solutions of single- and triple-injector configurations is observed, rendering fuel injector quantity irrelevant in 3D simulations. For reacting cases, weak inter-injector interactions cause minor discrepancies between the 3D computational results of single- and three-injector configurations. In both non-reacting and reacting flows, fuel injected from circular injectors initially exhibits three-dimensional effects. Turbulent mixing causes the spanwise gradients of flow parameters to diminish. Beyond 15 mm downstream of the injector exits, both non-reacting and reacting flows transition to quasi-2D states. Consequently, the flow distributions within the combustor predicted by 2D RANS have satisfactory agreement with 3D RANS results. Thus, 2D RANS can provide grid simplification advantages while maintaining reasonable fidelity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: