CNN-based networks demonstrate improved real-time processing on edge devices, suggesting viability for practical applications.
RGB-T semantic segmentation using thermal and RGB images simultaneously is actively being researched to robustly recognize the surrounding environment of vehicles regardless of challenging lighting and weather conditions. It is important for them to operate in real time on edge devices. As transformer-based approaches, which most recent RGB-T semantic segmentation studies belong to, are very difficult to perform on edge devices, this paper considers only CNN-based RGB-T semantic segmentation networks that can be performed on edge devices and operated in real time. Although EAEFNet shows the best performance among CNN-based networks on edge devices, its inference speed is too slow for real-time operation. Furthermore, even when channel pruning is applied, the speed improvement is minimal. The analysis of EAEFNet identifies the intermediate fusion of RGB and thermal features and the high complexity of the decoder as the main causes. To address these issues, this paper proposes a network using a ResNet encoder with an early-fused four-channel input and the U-Net decoder structure. To improve the decoder performance, bilinear upsampling is replaced with PixelShuffle. Additionally, mini Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) and Progressive Transposed Module (PTM) modules are applied. Since the Proposed Network is primarily composed of convolutional layers, channel pruning is confirmed to be effectively applicable. Consequently, channel pruning significantly improves inference speed, and enables real-time operation on the neural processing unit (NPU) of edge devices. The Proposed Network is evaluated using the MFNet dataset, one of the most widely used public datasets for RGB-T semantic segmentation. It is shown that the proposed method achieves a performance comparable to EAEFNet while operating at over 30 FPS on an embedded board equipped with the Qualcomm QCS6490 SoC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: