PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025JAMA Network Open37 citationsOpen Access

Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023

View Full Paper
FRFrederick Berro RiveraJMJohn Vincent MagalongNBNathan Ross B. Bantayan

Key Points

  • Women made up 41.0% of participants in cardiovascular trials from 2017 to 2023, highlighting gender disparities.
  • The F:M ratio was significantly lower in trials for coronary heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke.
  • Clinical trials on obesity and pulmonary hypertension showed higher female representation, indicating variations by disease type.
  • These findings suggest that disparities in clinical trial participation may perpetuate inequities in evidence-based care for women.

Abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death globally for both men and women, yet women remain historically underrepresented in CV clinical trials, despite facing a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality in many forms of CV disease. To determine the representation of women across a broad range of CV trials. The participation of women in CV trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2017 to 2023 was systematically determined through the extraction of publicly available information. Data were extracted to identify the country of study, disease type, trial size, clinical intervention, and age of the participants. The proportion of women and the ratio of number of female to male participants (F:M ratio) were calculated for each trial. The women's participation:prevalence ratio (PPR) was estimated for each trial based on the relative prevalence of the disease by sex in the specified region. A total of 1079 registered CV trials were identified, including 1 396 104 participants, of whom 571 641 (41.0%) were women. The F:M ratio was significantly lower for studies on arrhythmia (median IQR, 0.5), coronary heart disease (median IQR, 0.39 0.33-0.70), acute coronary syndrome (median IQR, 0.32 0.24-0.51), and heart failure (median IQR, 0.51 0.32-0.87) but higher for obesity (median IQR, 1.44 1.08-4.50) and pulmonary hypertension (median IQR, 2.86 1.50-3.97) trials. The F:M ratio was higher for trials on lifestyle interventions (median IQR, 1.51 0.77-3.24) than for drug trials. PPRs were low for clinical trials on coronary heart disease (median IQR, 0.66 0.50-0.86), acute coronary syndrome (median IQR, 0.79 0.51-0.87), and stroke (median IQR, 0.74 0.61-0.95). Representation of women in CV trials varied by disease state, region, intervention, and sponsor type. These findings highlight both progress and persistent challenges in representation of women within CV trials. These gaps not only limit the generalizability of trial outcomes but also perpetuate inequities in evidence-based care for women with CV conditions.

Expert Takes1 quote

“Nevertheless, although vascular diseases remain among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, women demonstrate distinct clinical patterns, including differences in symptom presentation, disease severity, and representation in RCTs, thereby limiting the generalizability and appli...”

ACC Journal ScanView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rivera et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb46b56d6d5674bccfe696https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper