This analysis demonstrates energy consumption predictions in additive manufacturing, suggesting GPR outperforms ANN.
Energy consumption in additive manufacturing processes is critical in improving environmental quality and attaining a sustainable equilibrium between energy use and environmental degradation. The study employs two widely accepted non-parametric machine learning (ML) methods, i.e., Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), to predict the energy consumption in the Fused Deposition Modeling manufacturing process (AM-FDM). The ANN and GPR models are compared based on a numerical general factorial design accounting for six graded-level parameters, i.e., A: learning rate, B: momentum. C: number of hidden nodes, D: proportions of the training data, E: proportion of test data, and F: the activation function. The sensitivity of the ANN and GPR models for the training subsets is further examined using different percentages of the original dataset—25%, 50%, and 75%—that are sampled using a modified hypercube sampling technique. Under all circumstances, the GPR model has performed better than the ANN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasraoui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: