Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Megastudy reveals email nudges increased one-time savings deposits, highlighting behavioral science's role in savings strategies.
In the United States, 24% of adults have no savings, and 39% have less than a month of income saved. We present results from a megastudy where nearly two million customers of a U.S. bank were randomly assigned to receive one of seven different two-month email campaigns, each employing a different behavioral science insight to nudge one-time and recurring savings deposits and increase savings balances, or to a control condition without such messages. These campaigns increased the probability of making a one-time savings deposit, on average, by 0.05 percentage points (a 0.51% increase over control). The best-performing campaign delivered weekly messages to customers that differed depending on recent savings behavior: messages to customers who hadn’t made a savings account deposit in the last week included a simple reminder to save while those to customers who had made a savings account deposit in the prior week were congratulated on this accomplishment. This top-performing campaign increased the monthly likelihood that a customer made a one-time savings deposit by 0.13 percentage points (a 1.32% increase). We estimate that rolling this two-month campaign out to everyone in our megastudy population would have led to an extra $6,123,996 to $9,910,090 in savings. Together, our findings highlight that light-touch, frequent, email nudges can cost-effectively create small increases in savings deposits in the United States. Ideally, to generate meaningful benefits, behavioral science insights would be incorporated into a wider range of communications and incentives designed by financial institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milkman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: