This comparison evaluates analytical performance and clinical accuracy of EH-2090 and UF-5000 in urinalysis, suggesting EH-2090 excels in counting urine formed elements.
In this study, we used manual microscopy as the gold standard, and compared the analytical and clinical performance of EH-2090 and UF-5000 to evaluate their application characteristics in daily clinical practice. Results show the EH-2090 has comparable analytical performance to Sysmex UF-5000. In clinical performance, the EH-2090 shows better counting accuracy for urine formed elements except bacteria. Besides, the EH-2090 could provide more accurate assessment especially in samples with yeast cells, crystals and dysmorphic red blood cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: