Qualitative analysis reveals the impact of the 2030 Agenda on sustainable agriculture, suggesting a focus on technology over justice.
Contextualization: Touted as one of the answers to the climate crisis, sustainable development raises many questions, such as the vagueness between its theoretical definition and its implementation in the real world. Consequently, it extends its inconsistencies to everything that operates within its logic, as can be seen in "sustainable agriculture", for which the pressure is to produce more and more while emitting fewer gases that contribute to the worsening of the greenhouse effect. In a context of global crisis, international organizations are guided by the premise of a common response, usually signed in international treaties. Objective: Thus, this work is guided by the objective of explaining the agriculture-climate change binomial under the 1988 Federal Constitution, the 2030 Agenda and the United Nations Framework Convention (UNFCCC). Methodology: To this end, we used a qualitative approach and the technical tools of a bibliographic and documentary review. Results: What emerges is that the deliberations of the COPs and the 2030 Agenda have favored discussions on technological innovation and the efficiency of systems, to the exclusion of the justice of restructuring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minassa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: