Analysis of job-switching and portfolio strategies for maximizing lifetime utility before retirement, indicating critical implications for investment behavior.
We study a finite-horizon optimal job-switching and portfolio allocation problem where an agent faces a mandatory retirement date. The agent can freely switch between two jobs with differing levels of income and leisure. The financial market consists of a risk-free asset and a risky asset, with the agent making dynamic consumption, investment, and job-switching decisions to maximize lifetime utility. The utility function follows a Cobb–Douglas form, incorporating both consumption and leisure preferences. Using a dual-martingale approach, we derive the optimal policies and establish a verification theorem confirming their optimality. Our results provide insights into the trade-offs between labor income and leisure over a finite career horizon and their implications for retirement planning and investment behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: