Retrospective cohort study found ERAS implementation reduced same-day readmission rates in orthognathic surgery, suggesting it enhances patient recovery.
Abstract Objectives We aimed to evaluate how a newly implemented Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol affected same-day discharge after orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods A retrospective, cohort study was performed on participants having undergone orthognathic surgery between 2015 and 2022 in our tertiary French department either via the former traditional non-ERAS or new ERAS protocol. The primary study endpoint was difference in unplanned same-day readmission (SDR) rates between protocol types. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of SDR. Results A total of 511 participants were included: n = 212(41.5%) followed the non-ERAS protocol and n = 299(58.5%) the ERAS protocol. SDR was significantly higher in the non-ERAS group (38.2%) compared to the ERAS group (24.1%) (p < 0.001), corresponding to a 37% relative reduction in SDR. In multivariate analysis, later surgery end time (adjOR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1–1.3; p < 0.001), associated genioplasty (adjOR 2.1, 95%CI 1.3–3.3; p = 0.0013), maxillary osteotomy (adjOR 2.6, 95%CI 1.5–4.4; p = 0.0004), and combined osteotomy (adjOR 4.1, 95%CI 2.5–6.8; p < 0.0001) were independently associated with higher SDR. Conversely, ERAS protocol implementation remained protective (adjOR 0.5, 95%CI 0.3–0.8; p = 0.004). Interaction analysis demonstrated that ERAS protocol implementation significantly reduced the risk of SDR among patients undergoing combined osteotomy (adjOR 0.39, 95%CI 0.16–0.95; p = 0.039). Conclusions ERAS protocol implementation reduced the risk of SDR with the greatest benefit observed for complex combined osteotomies. Clinical Relevance These findings support our ERAS protocol as a safe and effective for promoting outpatient orthognathic surgery, particularly in reducing complications after complex procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bencherqui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: