Analysis reveals how humidity influences negative air ions in various tree species, suggesting implications for urban green planning.
Abstract In order to analyze the effect of environmental factors on the release of negative air ions (NAI) by green tree species, this study conducted an open top chamber (OTC) control test in Beijing. The tree species selected were Acer truncatum, Sophora japonica, Pinus bungeana, and Pinus tabuliformis. The experiment investigated the effects of environmental factors on NAI release under different relative humidity conditions. The results of the study showed that: (1) The NAI release contribution (L), NAI release coefficient (n), NAI release rate (s), NAI instantaneous present amount (v), and total NAI release amount (Z) all showed positive responses to humidity. (2) Under constant temperature and light intensity, all five capability indicators increased with the humidity gradient (40%-80%) and reached their maximum values at 80% humidity. (3) NAI release was positively correlated with humidity, and the correlation coefficients were: Pinus tabuliformis (R² = 0.33) > Sophora japonica (R² = 0.17) > Acer truncatum (R² = 0.15) = Pinus bungeana (R² = 0.15, p < 0.05). (4) Under constant temperature and light intensity, the NAI release contribution (L) and NAI release coefficient (n) responded most strongly to humidity in the 40%-60% range, while the total NAI release amount (Z), NAI release rate (s), and NAI instantaneous present amount (v) responded more significantly in the 60%-80% range. Acer truncatum showed the strongest response in terms of NAI release contribution (L) and NAI release coefficient (n), while Sophora japonica exhibited the most significant response in terms of NAI release rate (s), NAI instantaneous present amount (v), and total NAI release amount (Z). This study, conducted using an OTC, clarifies the independent role of humidity on NAI released by green tree species, providing a scientific basis for forest recreation and urban green space planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: