Analysis reveals language's social structure and the significance of qualitative experience in Cometti’s work.
In this paper, I provide a sketch of Jean-Pierre Cometti’s original interpretation of John Dewey’s approach to language, emphasizing that it is grounded on a continuistic picture of language as a development of human experience, a naturalistic but non-naturalized conception of experience itself, and a strong focus on the primarily social structure of language and its connection to coordinated action. In the meantime, I suggest that Cometti’s continuistic thesis should explicitly address the issue of the ‘qualitative’ in experience, which is a major theme in both James’ and Dewey’s works. I suggest integrating his view through a broadly bio-cultural approach to the qualitative dimensions of experience, as distinct from the widespread idea that it is subjective, as well as more primitive and intrinsically foreign to language.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberta Dreon (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: