Scholarly commentary examines changes in nursing roles for vasopressor management, highlighting future demands.
Aim To examine the evolution of intensive care nurses’ roles in pharmacological haemodynamic management from 1975 to 2025 and to explore projected responsibilities through 2075. Design A scholarly commentary. Methods A critical synthesis of literature, historical accounts and clinical guidelines spanning 1975–2025, focussing on nursing practice, technology, workforce dynamics and patient safety in critical care pharmacology. Data Sources CINAHL, PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar and major pharmacological guideline repositories were searched for sources between 1975 and 2025, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, position papers and qualitative studies. Results Nurses have progressed from unstandardised vasoactive medication titration to advanced, protocol‐driven multimodal vasopressor strategies. Milestones include the early catecholamine era, nurse‐led sepsis protocols and contemporary adoption of peripheral vasopressor practices supported by technology. Looking ahead, intensive care nurses will increasingly supervise technologically driven titration, manage multimodal regimens, address drug shortages and sustain resilience amid workforce pressures. Conclusion Over the past five decades, nurses have transformed vasopressor management and remain essential in bridging innovation with ethical, patient‐centred care. The next 50 years will require advanced decision‐making, technological fluency and improved support for the nursing workforce. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Investment in simulation‐based education, workforce supports and ethical frameworks is vital to prepare nurses for expanding responsibilities and ensure patient safety. Impact Problem addressed Historical variability and future challenges in nursing roles for vasopressor management. Main findings Nurses have driven safety and innovation and will face increasing technological, ethical and workforce demands. Impact Relevant to critical care nurses, nurse educators, nurse leaders and policy‐makers worldwide shaping the future of critical care practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adrianna Watson (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: