Analysis reveals optimal borehole parameters for rock breaking in safety passages, indicating feasibility for multiple strata.
To address the challenge of determining the borehole layout scheme in the practical application of high-pressure gas expansion rock breaking, this study takes the excavation of the safety passage at Kaixuan Road Station on the North Extension Line 2 of Chongqing Metro Line 18 as the engineering background. The rock-breaking capacity was evaluated by analyzing the damaged zone volume caused by gas expansion using FLAC3D 6.0 numerical simulation software, and vibration monitoring was conducted for the historical buildings on the surface. This study revealed the following: (1) When the borehole depth is 1.2 m and the charge length is 0.6 m, the optimal angle is 70°, with the optimal vertical and horizontal spacing between holes being 1200 mm and 2000 mm, respectively. (2) The numerical simulations indicated that by adjusting the charge density, the optimized sandstone borehole network parameters could be applied to mudstone strata, and the rock-breaking effect was similar. The difference in the volume of the damaged zones obtained in the two strata was less than 3%. (3) The vibration analysis demonstrated that the peak particle velocity generated by high-pressure gas expansion rock fracturing at the ancient building directly above was 0.06316 cm/s, which was lower than the threshold value of 0.1 cm/s and approximately 67.95% lower than that of explosive blasting. Furthermore, when the tunnel depth exceeded 29 m, the vibration velocity of surface structures remained within the safety range. The results verified the feasibility of applying the same borehole network parameters to different strata, providing theoretical support for the practical application of high-pressure gas expansion rock fracturing technology in engineering projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: