PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Asian Biomedicine1 citations

Effects of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving the R-CHOP-21 regimen

View Full Paper
PNPannathorn NakaphanWeiss Memorial HospitalNUNoppacharn UaprasertThai Red Cross Society

Key Points

  • Primary G-CSF prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of febrile neutropenia events in DLBCL patients undergoing chemotherapy.
  • The non-prophylaxis group showed a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia at 17.2% compared to 8.3% in the prophylaxis group.
  • Analysis of medical records from 103 DLBCL patients highlighted the benefits of G-CSF prophylaxis for event-free survival.
  • Importance of prophylactic G-CSF use is underscored, particularly for patients at heightened risk for febrile neutropenia.

Abstract

Abstract Background Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisolone every 21 d (R-CHOP-21) chemotherapy varies based on physician discretion. Objectives The present study aims to investigate the impact of primary G-CSF prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia (FN) and other outcomes in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-21 in real-world practice. Methods Medical records of 103 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, aged 18–80 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy-four patients received primary G-CSF prophylaxis (prophylaxis group), while 29 patients did not receive prophylaxis (non-prophylaxis group). The occurrence of FN and other outcomes was compared between the two groups. Results The prophylaxis group had older patients (median ± interquartile ranges IQR, 63 ± 12 years vs. 50 ± 15 years, P < 0.001). The incidence of FN after the first R-CHOP was not statistically significant between groups (8.3% vs. 17.2%, P = 0.177). However, FN events were significantly higher in non-prophylaxis cycles (7.40%) compared with prophylaxis cycles (2.70%) ( P = 0.027). Cumulative FN events were lower in the prophylaxis group (14.9%) than in the non-prophylaxis group (27.6%) ( P = 0.134). FN-free survival was not significantly different between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups (hazard ratio HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval 95%CI, 0.17–1.35), while primary G-CSF prophylaxis significantly improved event-free survival (HR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.16–0.84). Conclusions Primary G-CSF prophylaxis may reduce the risk of FN in DLBCL patients undergoing R-CHOP-21 treatment. The present study highlights the importance of primary G-CSF prophylaxis, especially for those at high risk of FN.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nakaphan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb5f7a6d6d5674bcd03c77https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2025-0021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper