Introduction Trauma is the leading cause of death among individuals aged 1–44 years, and it is estimated that many of these deaths could be prevented. Clinical guidance is an essential step toward the optimization of trauma care, especially within rural environments. This qualitative case series seeks to better understand how trauma clinical guidance (TCG) plays a role in rural trauma providers’ patient management. Methods An initial exploratory qualitative case series consisting of five semi-structured interviews with rural providers recruited using snowball sampling from existing professional networks were conducted between February and April 2024. Providers were asked to provide details on how they approach clinical uncertainty and if clinical guidance plays a role in their decision making. Then, providers performed real-time reviews of clinical guidance documents, identifying areas for clinical guidance improvement. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and data analyzed using narrative and thematic approaches, with key themes identified through peer debriefing with relevant quotes selected. Results Of the five providers interviewed, three provide care at a critical access hospital, one provides care at a level II trauma center, and one at a level III trauma center. Two interviewees mentioned that they do not use clinical guidance often in direct patient care, and three highlighted the use of advanced trauma life support as the foundation of their practice on which they expand their tools and training. Common requests of TCG from rural providers included: (1) visual components to guide workflow, (2) easy discoverability in a central place, (3) relevant across various resource settings, (4) a centralized ‘stamp of approval,’ for guidelines that have been mutually agreed on via extensive collaboration, and (5) transfer guidance. Conclusion The needs of rural trauma providers should be a focal point when working to improve the creation and dissemination of TCG. Collaboration when creating new TCG is essential. By intentionally designing for the rural population, we will increase the reach and impact of the guidance developed, as well as improve its accessibility and usability for all providers, regardless of resource setting. Through these efforts, we will decrease the disparate burden of trauma and unintentional injury on rural patients and their healthcare providers. Level of evidence Level V.
Steiner et al. (Mon,) studied this question.