Observational analysis associates CURI with early detection of MASLD and liver fibrosis, suggesting improved screening methods.
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and significant liver fibrosis (SLF) require noninvasive screening. This study evaluates the C-reactive protein-to-uric acid index (CURI), combining inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, as a biomarker for early detection of MASLD and SLF. Methods: Using NHANES 2017-2020 data (n=6,687), participants were divided into training and validation cohorts. CURI was calculated as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP; mg/L) x [uric acid (mg/dL)]^3. Associations with MASLD and SLF were analyzed via logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and mediation analysis considering insulin resistance and adipose indices. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), comparing CURI with established indices: fatty liver index (FLI), hepatic steatosis index (HSI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4). Results: MASLD and SLF prevalence were 49.6% and 10.7%, respectively. CURI was independently associated with MASLD and SLF. Nonlinear relationships were observed. Combining CURI with FLI, HSI, or FIB-4 improved diagnostic performance compared to using them alone (AUC for MASLD: 0.852 with FLI, 0.819 with HSI, 0.690 with FIB-4; AUC for SLF: 0.811 with FLI, 0.750 with HSI, 0.699 with FIB-4, p<0.001). DCA showed net benefit for MASLD. Mediation analysis show 98.1% (MASLD) and 84.8% (SLF) of effects. Conclusion: CURI is a promising, cost-effective biomarker for MASLD/SLF risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huynh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: