Analysis reveals transcriptome changes linked to solid food ingestion in intestinal epithelial cells, suggesting a role of BEST4+ cells in development.
The suckling-to-weaning dietary transition is a key step in intestinal development. The aim of our study was to identify the transcriptome changes induced in each cell type of the intestinal epithelium at the onset of solid food ingestion. We compared the single-cell transcriptome of epithelial cells isolated from the caecum of age-matched littermate suckling male rabbits ingesting or not solid food. Our dataset provides the first single-cell atlas of the rabbit intestinal epithelium and highlights the interest of the rabbit as a model for studying BEST4+ epithelial cells, which are absent in mice. Solid food ingestion induced extensive transcriptome changes in each epithelial cell type, with the most pronounced changes noted in absorptive and BEST4+ cells. Some of the effects of solid food introduction were common to most epithelial cell types, such as the upregulation of ALDH1A1. Solid food ingestion remodeled epithelial defenses systems, as observed by the increased expression of interferon-stimulated genes in mature absorptive and BEST4+ cells. Solid food upregulated the gene expression of the immunoglobulin transporter PIGR in cells located at the base of epithelial crypts and in goblet cells. In addition, solid food triggered epithelial differentiation, which was associated with modification of the expression of genes involved in handling of nutrients, as well as changes in hormone expression by enteroendocrine cells. These cell type-specific transcriptome modifications induced by solid food ingestion coincided with changes in microbiota composition and were replicated, in part, by butyrate in organoids. Our work provides a single-cell atlas of the transcriptome changes induced in the intestinal epithelium at the suckling-to-weaning transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malonga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: