Exact formula reveals the mean first-passage time for diffusion on a hyper-cubic lattice, indicating significant variations with resetting dynamics.
We provide an exact formula for the mean first-passage time (MFPT) to a target at the origin for a single particle diffusing on a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mi>d</a:mi></a:math>-dimensional hypercubic starting from a fixed initial position <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:msub><b:mover accent="true"><b:mi>R</b:mi><b:mo>⃗</b:mo></b:mover><b:mn>0</b:mn></b:msub></b:math> and resetting to <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><d:msub><d:mover accent="true"><d:mi>R</d:mi><d:mo>⃗</d:mo></d:mover><d:mn>0</d:mn></d:msub></d:math> with a rate <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><f:mi>r</f:mi></f:math>. Previously known results in the continuous space are recovered in the scaling limit <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><g:mrow><g:mi>r</g:mi><g:mo>→</g:mo><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:mrow><g:mo>,</g:mo><g:mo> </g:mo><g:mrow><g:msub><g:mi>R</g:mi><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:msub><g:mo>=</g:mo><g:mrow><g:mo>|</g:mo><g:msub><g:mover accent="true"><g:mi>R</g:mi><g:mo>⃗</g:mo></g:mover><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:msub><g:mo>|</g:mo></g:mrow><g:mo>→</g:mo><g:mi>∞</g:mi></g:mrow></g:math> with the product <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mrow><i:msqrt><i:mi>r</i:mi></i:msqrt><i:mspace width="0.16em"/><i:msub><i:mi>R</i:mi><i:mn>0</i:mn></i:msub></i:mrow></i:math> fixed. However, our formula is valid for any <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><k:mi>r</k:mi></k:math> and any <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><l:msub><l:mover accent="true"><l:mi>R</l:mi><l:mo>⃗</l:mo></l:mover><l:mn>0</l:mn></l:msub></l:math> that enables us to explore a much wider region of the parameter space that are inaccessible in the continuum limit. For example, we have shown that the MFPT, as a function of <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><n:mi>r</n:mi></n:math> for fixed <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><o:msub><o:mover accent="true"><o:mi>R</o:mi><o:mo>⃗</o:mo></o:mover><o:mn>0</o:mn></o:msub></o:math>, diverges in the two opposite limits <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><q:mrow><q:mi>r</q:mi><q:mo>→</q:mo><q:mn>0</q:mn></q:mrow></q:math> and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><r:mrow><r:mi>r</r:mi><r:mo>→</r:mo><r:mi>∞</r:mi></r:mrow></r:math> with a unique minimum in between, provided the starting point is not a nearest neighbor of the target. In this case, the MFPT diverges as a power law <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><s:mrow><s:mo>∼</s:mo><s:msup><s:mi>r</s:mi><s:mi>ϕ</s:mi></s:msup></s:mrow></s:math> as <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><t:mrow><t:mi>r</t:mi><t:mo>→</t:mo><t:mi>∞</t:mi></t:mrow></t:math>, but very interestingly with an exponent <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><u:mrow><u:mi>ϕ</u:mi><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mo>(</u:mo><u:mo>|</u:mo><u:msub><u:mi>m</u:mi><u:mn>1</u:mn></u:msub><u:mo>|</u:mo><u:mo>+</u:mo><u:mo>|</u:mo><u:msub><u:mi>m</u:mi><u:mn>2</u:mn></u:msub><u:mo>|</u:mo><u:mo>+</u:mo><u:mo>...</u:mo><u:mo>+</u:mo><u:mo>|</u:mo><u:msub><u:mi>m</u:mi><u:mi>d</u:mi></u:msub><u:mo>|</u:mo><u:mo>)</u:mo><u:mo>−</u:mo><u:mn>1</u:mn></u:mrow></u:math> that depends on the starting point <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><v:mrow><v:msub><v:mover accent="true"><v:mi>R</v:mi><v:mo>⃗</v:mo></v:mover><v:mn>0</v:mn></v:msub><v:mo>=</v:mo><v:mi>a</v:mi><v:mspace width="0.16em"/><v:mrow><v:mo>(</v:mo><v:msub><v:mi>m</v:mi><v:mn>1</v:mn></v:msub><v:mo>,</v:mo><v:msub><v:mi>m</v:mi><v:mn>2</v:mn></v:msub><v:mo>,</v:mo><v:mo>...</v:mo><v:mo>,</v:mo><v:msub><v:mi>m</v:mi><v:mi>d</v:mi></v:msub><v:mo>)</v:mo></v:mrow></v:mrow></v:math> where <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><y:mi>a</y:mi></y:math> is the lattice spacing and <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><z:msub><z:mi>m</z:mi><z:mi>i</z:mi></z:msub></z:math>'s are integers. If, on the other hand, the starting point happens to be a nearest neighbor of the target, then the MFPT decreases monotonically with increasing <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><ab:mi>r</ab:mi></ab:math>, approaching a universal limiting value 1 as <bb:math xmlns:bb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><bb:mrow><bb:mi>r</bb:mi><bb:mo>→</bb:mo><bb:mi>∞</bb:mi></bb:mrow></bb:math>, indicating that the optimal resetting rate in this case is infinity. We provide a simple physical reason and a simple Markov-chain explanation behind this somewhat unexpected universal result. These interesting results on a lattice are not captured by the continuum theory. Our analytical predictions are verified in numerical simulations on lattices up to 50 dimensions. Finally, in the absence of a target, we also compute exactly the position distribution of the walker in the nonequlibrium stationary state that also displays interesting lattice effects not captured by the continuum theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: