Randomized, double-blinded clinical trial evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics of ALT-BB4 in healthy adults, indicating its potential as an alternative to traditional hyaluronidases.
Hyaluronidase has been used as an adjuvant to facilitate subcutaneous drug delivery by degrading hyaluronic acid, a viscoelastic barrier in subcutaneous tissue. However, traditional animal-derived hyaluronidases raise safety concerns, including risk of anaphylaxis and zoonoses. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ALT-BB4, a novel recombinant hyaluronidase derived from human hyaluronidase PH20, in healthy adults. This first-in-human, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 1 study included 244 participants who received single intradermal or subcutaneous injections of ALT-BB4 or placebo. The study was conducted in three parts: part I assessed drug allergy reactions, part II-A evaluated pharmacokinetics, and part II-B assessed safety and tolerability. Intradermal injection of ALT-BB4 exhibited a low incidence of drug allergy reactions (0.4%), with no significant difference compared with placebo (p = 0.317). Subcutaneous injection of ALT-BB4 resulted in more frequent injection site treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) compared with placebo (16.9% versus 0%; p < 0.001). All injection site TEAEs were mild, self-resolving, and did not require treatment. Systemic TEAEs were less frequent in the ALT-BB4 group compared with placebo (0.7% versus 5.6%; p = 0.045), and no serious adverse events were reported. Notably, no antidrug antibodies were detected. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed minimal systemic absorption of ALT-BB4. Both intradermal and subcutaneous injection of ALT-BB4 demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability, supporting its potential as a promising alternative to traditional animal-derived hyaluronidases. Future studies are warranted to confirm these findings in broader clinical settings. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05232175.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: