Introduction: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) includes a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Despite mortality benefits, implementation remains suboptimal. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in three outpatient Internal Medicine and Cardiology clinics within the East Tennessee State University Health system. Adults aged ≥18 years with ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% and at least one outpatient follow-up between December 2022 and November 2023 were included. Patients with contraindications to GDMT, end-stage renal disease, or limited life expectancy were excluded. GDMT use and dosing (none, <50%, ≥50 to <100%, 100% target dose) for beta-blockers, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i were assessed. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to examine patient characteristics and treatment patterns. Results: Among 236 eligible patients, only 16.5%, 10.2%, 31.4%, and 42.8% were receiving target doses of beta-blockers, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i, respectively. Quadruple therapy was prescribed in just 21.2% of patients, and fewer than 1% achieved target dosing for all four medication classes. MRA use was strikingly low, with 58.9% of patients not on therapy despite its well-established mortality benefit and relative affordability. Multivariable regression analysis revealed several notable associations. Increasing age was linked to lower odds of ACEI/ARB/ARNI use, while higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) favored treatment. MRA use was more likely among patients with lower SBP, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, obesity, and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF), with obesity and absence of AF being associated with achieving >50% of the target dose. SGLT2i therapy was more common in younger patients with lower ejection fraction and lower SBP, with type 2 diabetes mellitus being the strongest predictor for both initiation and dose optimization. Conclusion: These findings highlight a significant gap in GDMT implementation. Despite favorable patient profiles and a high cost-benefit ratio, MRA use remains limited in this cohort. Targeted interventions to support GDMT initiation and optimization in eligible patients may help reduce disparities in heart failure care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanku et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: